INDIVIDUALIZATION AND TALENT

Authors

  • Senad Bećirović

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.26340/muallim.v6i21.1200

Abstract

The development of the talented represents a very complex issue in the pedagogical theory. This area is not sufficiently researched. The results of the research are often very different and sometimes even quite conflicting. Thus many authors still believe that no complete theory on the development of the talent exists as of yet. There are great differences between the students in terms of their abilities and their a priori knowledge. This heterogeneity between the students requires a very balanced approach, one in which the educational needs of all students are satisfied. Individualism has shown to be a very efficient approach in such circumstances. Through individualism of the teaching method, teaching content and style of teaching, one can be able to get the full potential out of every student. Individualism is particularly important while working with students with special needs, such as gifted students. Extensive research has revealed that if teaching is not adjusted to the talented individuals, the constraints are placed on their motivation and the result is often their failure. This can be very  detrimental both for them and entire society. Many western-European countries and the America adopted the practice of creating the individualized plan for talented individuals (IEP) on the account of the significance of individualization in working with special needs students. These plans contain complete work program with the talented individuals. IEP must be adjustable and must satisfy both upbringing and educational aspects of the development of talented student. The teaching that does not involve individualization in working with the talented persons, results in lack of the motivation for learning and boredom on their part. This in turn causes unwanted consequences both for them and the society.

Published

06-08-2022

How to Cite

Bećirović, S. (2022). INDIVIDUALIZATION AND TALENT. Novi Muallim, 6(21), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.26340/muallim.v6i21.1200